Sacramento Law Group

  • Home
  • Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 7
    • Chapter 13
    • Chapter 11
    • Bankruptcy Law
  • License Defense
    • RCFE
    • Automotive & SMOG
    • Child Care
    • Contractor
    • Adult Residential Facility
    • Family Child Care Home
    • Foster Family Home
    • Nursing
  • Divorce
  • More
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate
    • Tax
    • Cannabis Tax
    • Personal Injury
    • Car Accident
    • Dog Bite
    • Immigration
    • Caregiver
    • Employment
    • Real Estate
    • DUI
  • Blog
  • Contact

Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan Must Be Feasible

For a chapter 13 bankruptcy attorney to file a confirmable plan it must be feasible. In other words, a successful chapter 13 plan must have a reasonable possibility of success. To demonstrate a reasonable possibility of success the debtor’s budget must show income in excess of expenses such that the debtor can afford chapter 13 plan payments.

Contact Our Bankruptcy Lawyer To Find Out If You Qualify For Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Inquiry Triggered By Objection

Inquiry into whether the chapter 13 plan is feasible is triggered by an objection to confirmation filed by the Trustee or an unsecured creditor. To determine whether the chapter 13 plan is feasible the court and Trustee will look to the debtor’s budget. As stated above, the debtor’s budget must show sufficient income after expenses to afford chapter 13 plan payments.

When A Plan Is Not Feasible

A chapter 13 bankruptcy plan is not feasible if there is a sizeable risk that the debtor will not be able to afford plan payments. Several instances can give rise to a finding of infeasibility. For instance, a sizeable risk of failure to afford plan payments may be found where the debtor has failed to meet plan payments since filing. A sizeable risk of failure may also be found where the debtor relies upon the income of others (nondebtors) to afford plan payments. For example, if a debtor is married and filing separately but relies upon the income of their nondebtor spouse to meet plan payments, the feasibility of the plan may be questioned since the nondebtor spouse is not obligated under the chapter 13 plan to contribute income accordingly. One clear instance of infeasibility is demonstrated by a plan’s reliance upon balloon payments where the future source of income required to meet the future payments is purely speculative. For example, a plan is not feasible if it proposes to fund future balloon payments from the sale of a house where there is no evidence of an impending sale.

To learn more about chapter 13 bankruptcy visit http://sacramentobankruptcylawyer.us/chapter-13-bankruptcy and find out how you can stop foreclosure or repossession through chapter 13 bankruptcy. If you are unsure whether you have enough disposable income to propose a feasible chapter 13 bankruptcy plan contact our bankruptcy attorney and schedule a free consultation.

Ask The Attorneys

    Meet The Attorneys

    Adam Garcia Sacramento Attorney

    Adam

    Jin Kim Sacramento Attorney

    Jin Kim

    Call for a Consultation

    (916) 596-1018

    Mon – Sat
    8 AM – 6 PM

    Related Pages

    • 3 vs 5 Year Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan
    • Best Interests of Creditors Test in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Plan Must Be Feasible
    • Cure Defaults on Long-Term Debts in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Good Faith in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • When Can You File Chapter 13 After Chapter 7

    Disclaimer

    We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Furthermore, the information contained in this website is not guaranteed to be up to date, accurate, or complete. An attorney-client relationship can only be established by signing a representation agreement.
    • Sitemap
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    *$900 Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Fee Disclaimer: While most cases qualify for the above fee, some cases are complex. Consequently, the above fee is only a sample fee (not a specific or guaranteed fee) and is subject to change at any time due to the necessity of charging more for complex cases. The sample chapter 7 fee represents the typical fee for a simple no-asset chapter 7 case. The $900 fee is only available to residents of the following counties: Sacramento, Placer, Yolo, Solano and San Joaquin. Residents of other counties may be charged more.