Sacramento Law Group

  • Home
  • Bankruptcy
    • Chapter 7
    • Chapter 13
    • Chapter 11
    • Bankruptcy Law
  • License Defense
    • RCFE
    • Automotive & SMOG
    • Child Care
    • Contractor
    • Adult Residential Facility
    • Family Child Care Home
    • Foster Family Home
    • Nursing
  • Divorce
  • More
    • Estate Planning
    • Probate
    • Tax
    • Cannabis Tax
    • Personal Injury
    • Car Accident
    • Dog Bite
    • Immigration
    • Caregiver
    • Employment
    • Real Estate
    • DUI
  • Blog
  • Contact

Veterinarians and Dog Groomers Assume The Risk of A Dog Bite When Treatment Begins Or When They Consent To Treatment

While California statute holds dog owners strictly liable when their dog bites another person, dog owners have a defense available when their dog bites a dog groomer, veterinarian, or kennel worker: assumption of the risk. Courts have reasoned that dog groomers, veterinarians, and kennel workers have knowingly assumed the natural risk of their profession that they may be bitten by a dog. While dogs may act docile while under the control of their owner in a familiar environment, it is common for these animals to become uncharacteristically aggressive when under the control of the professional in a foreign environment under the stresses of treatment. In that event, animal professionals are said to have knowingly assumed the risk of the common event that a dog might bite them in the course of treatment. Therefore, while dog owners are generally strictly liable by operation of California’s dog bite statute, dog owners are not similarly liable to veterinarians, dog groomers, and kennel workers since these professionals have assumed the risk of a dog bite as an inherent risk of their profession. However, dog owners can only enjoy this defense once these professionals actually assume that risk by beginning or agreeing to treatment. Assumption of the risk only applies where the professional has knowingly assumed the risk, and a professional only knowingly assumes that risk with a particular dog once treatment begins or once they agree to so treat the animal. For instance, a dog owner cannot bring in their vicious, snarling pit bull on a leash to a dog groomers office, unleash the dog which summarily savages the entire staff, and later claim that the dog groomers assumed the risk of being bitten by the dog. In that case, the dog groomers did not assume that risk as it applies to that dog because they did not agree to treat the dog. If they agreed to treat the dog and began grooming the snarling pit bull, then they have assumed the risk of being bitten. In conclusion, the defense that a dog groomer, veterinarian, or kennel worker has assumed the risk of being bitten by a dog begins once the professional has agreed or actually begun to treat or service the animal.

Ask The Attorneys

    Meet The Attorneys

    Adam Garcia Sacramento Attorney

    Adam

    Jin Kim Sacramento Attorney

    Jin Kim

    Call for a Consultation

    (916) 596-1018

    Mon – Sat
    8 AM – 6 PM

    Related Pages

    • Dog Bite Defense: Assumption of the Risk
    • Dog Bite Defense: Veterinarian’s Rule
    • Dog Bite Defense: When Assumption of the Risk Starts
    • Dog Bite Injury: No Broken Skin

    Disclaimer

    We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The information contained in this website is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Furthermore, the information contained in this website is not guaranteed to be up to date, accurate, or complete. An attorney-client relationship can only be established by signing a representation agreement.
    • Sitemap
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    *$900 Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Fee Disclaimer: While most cases qualify for the above fee, some cases are complex. Consequently, the above fee is only a sample fee (not a specific or guaranteed fee) and is subject to change at any time due to the necessity of charging more for complex cases. The sample chapter 7 fee represents the typical fee for a simple no-asset chapter 7 case. The $900 fee is only available to residents of the following counties: Sacramento, Placer, Yolo, Solano and San Joaquin. Residents of other counties may be charged more.